In existing-building projects, the solution must be technically defensible in relation to its context, not only correctly calculated in isolation.
A structure is not only a numerical result. In restoration and strengthening projects, it becomes an argument: it explains why one solution is compatible, why another should be avoided, and how the balance between safety, execution, and heritage can be maintained.
Calculation must be translated into decision
At the Casino, many decisions did not stop with checking a single element. They had to be discussed with architecture, execution, and the logic of restoration.
Compatibility is part of resistance
A solution can be sufficient from a resistance point of view and still be unsuitable for the building if it requires disproportionate demolition or transfers problems into other areas.
Explanation is part of the project
In complex projects, the structure has to be explained and defended coherently.
